Residential

OverviewRooftop PV at volumeRoof & dronePlanes measured on the roofAttic & structureRafters recordedElectricalPanel and interconnectionDesign & engineeringModel to stamped setHomeowners: free monitoringAlready have solar? Free reviewUnderperformance checkFree tool for homeowners

Commercial & Industrial

OverviewBig roofs, real structureOn-site surveyRoof, structure, switchgearDesign & engineeringPE stampedVisual inspectionModule resolutionThermal inspectionFaults as heatElectroluminescenceCell-level cracks

Utility-Scale

OverviewThousands of acresLiDAR topographyTerrain before earthworkLand surveyingBoundary and topographicConstruction monitoringProgress, measuredThermal & ELEvery string

Across every scale

Site surveysRoof and electrical, one visitPermitting & engineeringStamped plan setsInspectionAerial thermal and ELShading analysisSA, TOF and TSRFSurvey locationsState and metro guides

The platform

Platform overviewPortal, 3D models, live dataFeature guidesWho it serves and how it worksShading analysisMove the sun yourselfCost calculatorWhat bad field data costs you

Sign in

Vanguard AccessInvite only · survey data portal

Solar reference

Solar questions answeredResidential, commercial and utility-scaleSurvey methodologySources, measurements and limitsCompany factsOfficial services and capabilities

Field Notes · build vs. buy

What a survey really costsPart 01 · the full modelUtilization is the whole gamePart 02 · a real TuesdayThe break-even headcountWhen hiring pays offTwo technicians, two roofsVariance, measuredThe hybrid crewIn-house plus outsourced

Field Notes · reference

Site survey checklistBuilt backwards from reworkHow long a survey takesHour by hourDo panels need a permit?What goes in the packageStorage site surveysThe capture listCompare survey vendorsQuestions to ask any vendor

Company

All servicesAll Field NotesAboutBook a 15-min call

Home  /  Field Notes  /  Thermal scan vs EL test

Field Notes · Commercial & Industrial

Thermal scan vs EL test: which defects each one catches

Thermal imaging and electroluminescence look at different physical signals. Each one sees faults the other can miss.

C&IEL8 min read

Short answer

A thermal scan shows heat, so it finds faults that dissipate energy, such as hot cells, failed bypass diodes and bad connections, while the array is working. An EL test drives current through the modules so the cells emit infrared light, which reveals cell-level damage such as microcracks and inactive regions that may not heat up. Use thermal for broad screening and EL when you need cell-level detail.

Two different signals

Both methods use infrared cameras, which is why they are sometimes confused. They answer different questions because they observe different physical effects.

Infrared thermography records the temperature of the module surface. A module that is generating power and has a fault often shows a warmer area where energy is lost as heat. The array is working normally while it is scanned.

Electroluminescence, or EL, works the other way round. Current is passed through the module so that the solar cells emit weak infrared light, much like an LED. A camera records the light. Healthy cell areas glow evenly, while cracked, disconnected or damaged regions appear dark or patterned. The image is a picture of the cell structure, which is why it can show damage that heat does not.

What thermal imaging is good at

  • Hot cells. A cell that is dissipating power shows as a warm spot.
  • Failed bypass diodes. A substring that is bypassed or conducting incorrectly appears as a distinct thermal pattern.
  • Connection problems. Poor terminations and connectors that run hot.
  • Mismatch and string issues. Modules or strings behaving differently from their neighbors.
  • Speed across a large area. A drone can cover a big array quickly, which is why thermal is the natural broad screen.

The conditions matter. The array has to be producing under steady sun, as described in when to fly a drone thermal scan.

What thermal imaging can miss

Many microcracks do not create a hot spot at the moment of the scan. Cells that are partly disconnected may not change the surface temperature enough to stand out. Defects can exist for a long time without a thermal signature, and an all-clear thermal image does not rule them out.

What EL is good at

  • Microcracks. Fine cracks in cells appear as dark lines.
  • Inactive cell regions. Areas that no longer contribute current appear dark.
  • Broken interconnects and finger interruptions. Disconnected parts of a cell.
  • Handling and manufacturing damage. Problems that began before or during installation.

The EL test sees cell structure directly, so it can show a defect before it grows into a heat problem.

What EL can miss or cost you

EL requires driving current through the modules, which usually means taking them offline or testing sections, and it is often done in low light or at night so the weak emission can be seen. That makes it slower and more involved than a thermal flyover. It also shows the cell-level condition but not the behavior of the whole array under load, so it does not replace thermal for connection and string issues.

Using both

A common approach for a commercial array is to use thermal as the broad screen and EL as the closer look.

Thermal first

Scan the whole array and identify the locations with heat-related findings. Pair the thermal images with visible images so each finding is located.

EL where the question is cell damage

Use EL on modules of interest: those flagged by thermal, those from a questionable lot, modules after a hail or handling event, or a sample for a warranty discussion. The result tells you whether the cells are cracked and how extensive the damage is.

Visual for the surface

Add visual inspection for soiling, physical damage and mounting problems. The visual inspection checklist shows what to record.

How to decide

  • Need a fast screen of a whole array: thermal.
  • Suspect cracks after an event or during handover: EL.
  • Production dropped and the cause is unknown: thermal first, then EL on suspect modules.
  • Planning a warranty claim: ask the manufacturer which evidence they accept, and use that method.

For the scheduling side of the thermal program, see how often a commercial array should get an infrared inspection.

What to bring to the conversation

Whichever method you choose, the provider will do better work with a few documents: the as-built layout with module positions, the module make and model, monitoring data showing where output dropped, and a description of any events such as storms or work on the array. With those, the choice between thermal, EL or both becomes a short conversation instead of a guess, and the findings can be tied back to the exact modules involved.

Where Solar Survey AI fits

Our electroluminescence (EL) inspection service drives current through the array so the cells emit infrared, making microcracks and inactive cell regions visible that visual and thermal inspection can miss. Combined with thermal and visual work, it gives a complete picture of the array. Tell us what you are trying to settle and we will recommend the combination.

Questions we get about this

What is the difference between thermal imaging and EL?

Thermal imaging records heat from a working array. EL passes current through the modules so the cells emit infrared light, revealing cell-level damage.

Does thermal imaging find microcracks?

Sometimes, but many microcracks do not produce a thermal signature under normal load. EL is better at showing them.

Why is EL harder to do than a drone flyover?

EL needs current driven through the modules and is often done in low light, so it takes more setup than a thermal flyover.

Should I use both methods?

Often yes. Use thermal as a broad screen and EL on modules where cell damage is the question.

Which method is better for a warranty claim?

It depends on what the manufacturer accepts as evidence. Ask them before choosing.

Related reading

More in Field Notes, or see every service.

Scoping a commercial project?

Tell us the building, the scope and the timeline. We will tell you straight what the work needs to cover and whether we fit.

Book a 15-min call
Book a 15-min call